senators.

His political career is closed forever, since he has offended the only authority which is able to promote his success. ", "This Constitution…can only end in despotism…when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government, being incapable of any other.

We are often good speakers of “democracy and freedom,” but even better at waging wars. For my part, I am persuaded that in all governments, whatever their nature may be, servility will cower to force, and adulation will cling to power. Effects Of The Tyranny Of The Majority Upon The National Character Of The Americans. In that immense crowd which throngs the avenues to power in the United States I found very few men who displayed any of that manly candor and that masculine independence of opinion which frequently distinguished the Americans in former times, and which constitutes the leading feature in distinguished characters, wheresoever they may be found. So states the Chinese man of wisdom, the military genius Sun Tzu, writes historian Hanne Herland in her weekly column at World Net Daily, the leading conservative news outlet in America. In democratic States organized on the principles of the American republics, this is more especially the case, where the authority of the majority is so absolute and so irresistible that a man must give up his rights as a citizen, and almost abjure his quality as a human being, if te intends to stray from the track which it lays down. The reason of this is perfectly clear: no monarch is so absolute as to combine all the powers of society in his own hands, and to conquer all opposition with the energy of a majority which is invested with the right of making and of executing the laws. It is in the examination of the display of public opinion in the United States that we clearly perceive how far the power of the majority surpasses all the powers with which we are acquainted in Europe.

Herland Report: French Revolution Tyranny: A study of Mob rule: The great rulers in history knew perfectly well how to control the mob.Empires often ruthlessly pushed for conquest of the weak and revenues from the conquered, yet he who holds the moral high ground tends to win in the long run.

The populace assembled, broke the printing-presses, and attacked the houses of the newspaper editors. Unbelievers are to be met with in America, but, to say the truth, there is no public organ of infidelity. If, on the other hand, a legislative power could be so constituted as to represent the majority without necessarily being the slave of its passions; an executive, so as to retain a certain degree of uncontrolled authority; and a judiciary, so as to remain independent of the two other powers; a government would be formed which would still be democratic without incurring any risk of tyrannical abuse. When the American Revolution broke out they arose in great numbers, for public opinion then served, not to tyrannize over, but to direct the exertions of individuals. The excesses of monarchical power had devised a variety of physical means of oppression: the democratic republics of the present day have rendered it as entirely an affair of the mind as that will which it is intended to coerce. But in a nation where democratic institutions exist, organized like those of the United States, there is but one sole authority, one single element of strength and of success, with nothing beyond it. So, our government's powers are all self promoted and self managed. Napoleon was acutely aware of the dangers of hypocrisy within the church, having attended Catholic schools and seen much of the injustice within the institutionalized church systems, yet he still believed that religious values such as “love thy neighbor” were ideals that needed to be taught in society to uphold social order. ", "Ordaining of laws in favor of one part of the nation to the prejudice and oppression of another is certainly the most erroneous and mistaken policy...An equal dispensation of protection, rights, privileges, and advantages, is what every part is entitled to, and ought to enjoy. Benjamin Franklin was dubbed “The First American” for a reason. The empire of the majority succeeds much better in the United States, since it actually removes the wish of publishing them. exemption for fair use of copyrighted works. Many observers, who have witnessed the anarchy of democratic States, have imagined that the government of those States was naturally weak and impotent. Yet, the idealization of brute revolutions has tended not to always lead to the wished for result.

Intellectual principles exercise an influence which is so invisible, and often so inappreciable, that they baffle the toils of oppression. "Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect." However, Franklin’s role in our founding has been eclipsed in modern memory by his many other accomplishments. If it be admitted that a man, possessing absolute power, may misuse that power by wronging his adversaries, why should a majority not be liable to the same reproach?

Anyone who opposed the revolution was to be eliminated. management. "It is of great importance in a republic not only to guard the society against the oppression of its rulers, but to guard one part of the society against the injustice of the other part. ", "Freedom of speech is a principal pillar of a free government; when this support is taken away, the constitution of a free society is dissolved, and tyranny is erected on its ruins. Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription. It would have been impossible for the sycophants of Louis XIV to flatter more dexterously.

Americans remember Benjamin Franklin as one of our founders. The key to restoring the press in that vital role is to cultivate a greater diversity of voices in the media. At that time the war was very popular in Baltimore. A majority taken collectively may be regarded as a being whose opinions, and most frequently whose interests, are opposed to those of another being, which is styled a minority. One of those most brilliant essays ever written. The truth is, that when once hostilities are begun between parties, the government loses its control over society. Tyranny may be exercised by means of the law, and in that case it is not arbitrary; arbitrary power may be exercised for the good of the community at large, in which case it is not tyrannical. All this CHANGE has produced a new effort to educate oneself on the principles of government. A distinction must be drawn between tyranny and arbitrary power. The Battle for America” WND, NEW BOOK explains why Trump challenges Globalism: “Trump. Tyranny usually employs arbitrary means, but, if necessary, it can rule without them. The French church was not reinstated until Napoleon came to power.

I don’t think that is what we want. The Battle for America” describes the drivers for the Panic Fear of Covid-19, Viking Warrior King Saint Olaf Haraldsson of Norway (Olav den Hellige) and Olsok Kvitekrist, The Secret world of Gold and why Modern Monetary Theory is doomed to fail, Trump-Netanyahu meeting: More Arab nations peace treaty with Israel coming up, Transition Integrity Project (TIP): The Democrat plan to Steal the Election, writes Chris Farrell, Judicial Watch. The aristocratic part of society supports him in some countries, and the democracy in others.

But the mass of the nation does not degrade itself by servitude: it often submits from weakness, from habit, or from ignorance, and sometimes from loyalty. The authority of a king is purely physical, and it controls the actions of the subject without subduing his private will; but the majority possesses a power which is physical and moral at the same time; it acts upon the will as well as upon the actions of men, and it represses not only all contest, but all controversy.

Empires often ruthlessly pushed for conquest of the weak and revenues from the conquered, yet he who holds the moral high ground tends to win in the long run. In the United States no one is punished for this sort of works, but no one is induced to write them; not because all the citizens are immaculate in their manners, but because the majority of the community is decent and orderly. The Inquisition has never been able to prevent a vast number of anti-religious books from circulating in Spain. It can be little doubted that, if the State of Rhode Island was separated from the Confederacy and left to itself, the insecurity of right under the popular form of government within such narrow limits would be displayed by such reiterated oppressions of the factious majorities, that some power altogether independent of the people would soon be called for by the voice of the very factions whose misrule had proved the necessity of it.". People were executed at the smallest hint of opposition; orgies were organized in churches as a direct move by radicals to spite religion. A general law—which bears the name of Justice—has been made and sanctioned, not only by a majority of this or that people, but by a majority of mankind. Again, thanks. Posted on 03/28/2009 8:31:50 AM PDT by Loud Mime. The restriction of religion to private life therefore does not necessarily threaten the vital interests of the majority religion, if there is one, and it protects minority religions from tyranny of the majority. *c And for these reasons I can never willingly invest any number of my fellow-creatures with that unlimited authority which I should refuse to any one of them. This development more than anything else skews the paradigm of the Framers. Tyranny Of A Majority - A James Madison View By Paul Von Ward 4-25-5 . "Why, the truth is, that they are not disinclined to vote, but they are afraid of being maltreated; in this country the law is sometimes unable to maintain its authority without the support of the majority. It is quite remarkable – this is how modern Western democracy first was implemented in Europe, by brutal force and authoritarian, illiberal new elites. ", "How comes it, then, that at the polling-booth this morning I did not perceive a single negro in the whole meeting? It is the end of civil society. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7M-7LkvcVw. The tyranny of the executive power will come in its turn, but at a more distant period." If great writers have not at present existed in America, the reason is very simply given in these facts; there can be no literary genius without freedom of opinion, and freedom of opinion does not exist in America. But the ruling power in the United States is not to be made game of; the smallest reproach irritates its sensibility, and the slightest joke which has any foundation in truth renders it indignant; from the style of its language to the more solid virtues of its character, everything must be made the subject of encomium. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given. ", "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. I know no country in which there is so little true independence of mind and freedom of discussion as in America.